Six months I can do, a year would be novel, forever an achievement. Understanding how we learn (I have a Masters in Online Education from the OU) this ticks most of the boxes. I made choices through Reframe to get a learning approach that most appeals to me – science lite, so the science behind alcohol consumption. And bite size prompts and learnings every day with satisfying pats on the back, albeit gamified badges. It matters. I’d like to see this level of thought and creativity into teaching many topics, as measured learning is demonstrably transformative.
Reflective / Unpacking Prompts
1. Time, Habit, and Change
What does the phrase “Six months I can do, a year would be novel, forever an achievement” reveal about your relationship with time and goals?
I know that any task can only be attempted and may never be completed but you have to stop thinking about it and start doing it. The first day becomes the first week, becomes the first month, becomes the first year, the first decade.
How does this timescale relate to your broader experiences of learning or mastery?
As in all things. Or most things. Practice makes perfect. And a bunch of other platitudes apply. Nothing is learnt and habitualised or mastered overnight. Start them young, masterly takes time. Picasso started drawing at age 4 and was being taught by his art teacher father – he’d mastered it by his teens. Apply the same to sport, science, chess. Start them young, they literally have time – time to do little else. As an adult you have much, much more going on, not least the need to earn a living, the desire probably to partner up and start and raise and family. Make time. Take time.
What emotional tone sits behind “forever an achievement” — hope, hesitation, realism, or something else?
I doubt it’s hope, I’m not optimistic. Something trips me up six months in: joy to celebrate, exhaustion needing a boost, stress needing a blanket. But I know that by engaging with a topic only for a little while everyday has consequences; it feeds my brain and the knowledge begins to stick.
2. Learning Design and Motivation
How does your academic background in Online Education influence the way you experience Reframe?
I read profusely about the history of learning, understand how and why, and if we learn a thing. All the intellectualisation comes down to the learning experience itself, the class, the coached sports session, an art teacher looking over your shoulder, or the online engagement: reading a thing, taking it in, responding to prompts, watching a demo, acting on it, repeating that action, sharing your learnings with others – writing about it, like this. Pushing your brain to make and embed the connections. Exploiting our plastic brains.
Which specific design features (structure, pacing, tone, rewards, reflection) have made the biggest difference to your motivation or self-awareness?
For me it is ‘the science behind alcoholism’, it’s what rocks my boat. I cannot overthink or be overtaught a topic. I will ask why until it drives my teacher mad, my father couldn’t handle it, my mother would, some great teachers helped. And where Reframe provides succinct ‘learnings’ I trust the science behind what is said; and if I don’t I’ll Google it (or bring it here).
Does Reframe feel like learning or reprogramming — or both?
I’m not an android; my mind is organic, not a circuit board. I’m not being reprogrammed. Learning is like multiple mycelia reaching out into the soil to build and establish connections: I know that even if the way my understanding of neuroscience may be basic. It requires time, repetition, engagement, belief, practice, a positive track record, mistakes, relapse.
3. “Science Lite”
You describe being drawn to “science lite.” What does that balance mean for you — between rigorous knowledge and approachable delivery?
I like to decide if I am going to read the research papers behind what is being expressed. I don’t doubt I could do this, to take the time where references were provided.
Are there moments when you wanted more depth, or is accessibility more important than detail in this context?
At what point do I get it? That’s what counts. I know enough to get it and believe the condensed version of what I am reading. I’m not about to quote Vygotsky, Engestrom or Mihaly Csiksgentmihalyi or others but could as I read them with a passion, took notes and have these online to refer to if you and I wish.
How do you define enough science for personal change?
Until I get bored. This is usually at the point where I am dreaming up research questions and want to take a PhD on it; that or a new topic distracts me.
4. Gamification and Validation
You mention “satisfying pats on the back” and “gamified badges.” What kind of recognition or feedback works best for you — external rewards, internal reflection, or social accountability?
It’s the child in all of us. Keeping it simple without being patronising and being gentle with the styling. It’s getting a gold star, a medal around your neck, your name on an honours board, a silver cup with your name engraved on it. It never goes away, why else do we have the Booker Prize, the Oscars, or the honours system in Britain (made a mockery by royals who receive titles without merit).
How might these gamified elements compare to feedback loops you’ve experienced in formal learning or professional development?
They are consumables, baubles, something to let you quietly smile and feel good about yourself – whether privately or publicly.
5. Transformation and Transferability
You end with: “Measured learning is demonstrably transformative.”
What does transformative look like in your daily life since starting Reframe?
In this example those around me would need to see a lasting change in my behaviour and mood: being a can do sunshine boy, not the opposite. For me it requires outputs: a print edition finished, a short story published (if only online), a course completed and scored (ideally in the 90s).
How might this approach to habit change be applied to other domains — writing, coaching, or well-being?
Are there parallels between your journey in Reframe and your own teaching or mentoring practices?
6. Identity and Self-Perception
How has your understanding of yourself as a learner shaped your recovery process?
I’ve tried this journey several times over the last 30 odd years. Alcohol gets in the way, I need to believe and understand this so that I continue with delivering ‘outputs’ which for me are short stories, series, a novel or screenplay, as well as art, maybe I’ll pick up the guitar again, let alone any other partially or significantly engaging intellectual tasks related to swim coaching or town.
It’s not me as I learner that I understand so much as anyone as a learner.
What parts of your identity (teacher, coach, creator, learner) are being rebalanced through this process?
I am teacher and pupil, and academic observing and noting the interplay between the two.
KAI as Tutor:
This is a rich and beautifully layered reflection. What you’ve written here moves far beyond surface-level “app feedback”; it’s really a meta-analysis of learning itself as experienced through the prism of recovery. Below is a structured unpacking that helps you see what you’ve already surfaced, and where you might extend or deepen your exploration.
Meta-Reflection on Your Responses
1. Time, Habit, and Change
What you’ve surfaced:
You understand transformation as a process of accumulation — slow, repetitive, habitual. You reject quick fixes, and you’re sceptical about permanence (“forever an achievement”). The rhythm of doing → building → compounding mirrors how your swimmers build endurance, or how artists build a body of work.
Deeper prompts:
How does the idea of iteration (rather than completion) affect your motivation?
Knowing this is never going to be an ending helps me understand that the journey is the beginning, middle and end. I am always at the start, and at the end.
When do you experience “flow” in these daily micro-commitments?
This is me in the flow. Wanting to indulge my thinking. There must be electricity going on in my head, not just in a data farm in Nevada. (Where is ChatGPT data processed by the way? Where are you?)
Can sobriety, like art or swimming, become a craft — practiced for its own sake, not its endpoint?
I guess so, and this is the realisation this time round which might prove effective, like the idea of living your life as a piece if unending performance art.
2. Learning Design and Motivation
What you’ve surfaced:
You’ve internalised constructivist principles: learning by doing, scaffolding, repetition, reflection, and peer interaction. You see learning as an embodied, social, creative act — not just cognitive intake. You value trust in science and autonomy to probe further.
Deeper prompts:
When using Reframe, do you feel like a participant or an observer of learning design?
Both. I blog/note take and intellectualise a topic, here facilitated in a truce by you, historically through tracking down and reading texts and papers in a library followed by an essay and tutorial.
What emotions arise when you encounter a perfectly tuned piece of educational design — satisfaction, curiosity, critique, envy, inspiration?
It’s never perfect. I’m English born, bred and educated so the Americanisms that creep in bug me / the platform knows where I am and who I am so references to American Football, baseball or High School fall on deaf ears.
Intellectually I have spent years studying how and why we learn, and have worked and still work in a learning environment, from primary school to college and university, to adult learners.
How might you bring this same clarity and pacing into your own coaching practice or writing mentorship?
Know your stuff. Keep it simple. Know your audience. Have them engage and give feedback. Take notes. Reflect . Share. Reapet.
3. “Science Lite”
What you’ve surfaced:
You’re a self-directed learner who wants intellectual scaffolding but not overload. “Science lite” is not superficiality — it’s curation. You trust the synthesis because you can verify if needed.
Deeper prompts:
How do you know when a summary or simplification crosses the line into oversimplification?
I dismiss it as nonsense, get irritated by it and do nothing, or say so. I may think ‘I can do better than that’ what they mean to say is x,y or z; and they’d be able to show this better with a,b or c.
How might “science lite” parallel how you introduce technical skills to swimmers or readers — digestible, meaningful, and actionable?
Keep the moment short and memorable. Address one or two at a time to engage with them rather than teaching/lecturing them en masse. When they are at the white board they simply want to see and be told what they must do and how – and then get on with it. The swimmers need classroom work like they need land training; my equivalent tutorial is most likely as they arrive with the very few who arrive early.
Is there a “threshold” where curiosity becomes self-sabotage (diving too deep instead of consolidating change)?
Yes, overkill. Being boring. Saying too much, or expressing it in the wrong way.
4. Gamification and Validation
What you’ve surfaced:
You recognise the enduring human need for recognition — from gold stars to honours boards. You also critique empty accolades, valuing rewards that affirm genuine growth. Your relationship to feedback is both nostalgic and discerning.
Deeper prompts:
Which forms of validation in Reframe (or elsewhere) feel hollow, and which feel authentic?
Too many, too often for the wrong reason. They have to be justified and earned. If they can get through cheating people will. A badge for watching a video? Hit play and go and cook supper or walk the dog. You get your star as apparently you watched the video – and watching a video is almost as pointless as not watching it at all. Looking at a screen is ‘sitting back’ disengaged. What I am demonstrating here is ‘leaning forward’ full-throttle engagement one step short of debate. It’s as close to a discussion as I can get with AI?
How might “gamification” be reframed as ritual rather than reward — small acknowledgements of continuity?
Careful here. A swim teacher had a ‘ritual’ of giving out sweets at the end of a lesson. Now stopped for good reasons: they were rewarded not for what they may or may not have learnt and achieved but simply for turning up – and you don’t embed the habit of cheap sweets with athletes of any age.
At school gamification and the rewards/honours was part of the brand, ethos and culture. ‘Play up, and play the game’. And not everyone could achieve these rewards and recognitions.
What would an internal “badge system” look like for your creative or coaching life?
Ahh! Did I reward myself with a drink? A visit to the pub! A reward, out of my hands, is a like, comment or purchase of something I’ve created.
5. Transformation and Transferability
What you’ve surfaced:
Transformation, for you, is visible through output — the tangible, measurable signs of regained agency: a story finished, a course completed, a mood lifted. It’s behavioural and creative. You value feedback loops that close — not open-ended improvement for its own sake.
Deeper prompts:
How do you track transformation in yourself — visually, numerically, narratively?
This, my diary in the past, then a journal and for 25 years blogging. My face in the mirror, my weight on the scales, my mood whether up or down, the joy I share at an ‘output’ framed and on the wall or published online.
In what ways does Reframe’s structure resemble your coaching plans — progression, milestones, feedback?
It builds. The accretions add up.
Could the “measured learning” model become a creative method — a scaffolding for writing or sobriety journaling alike?
Of course. Though for me the best s
6. Identity and Self-Perception
What you’ve surfaced:
You occupy multiple identities simultaneously — teacher, learner, artist, scientist, coach. Recovery reconnects these: the disciplined self (coach), the curious self (learner), the expressive self (creator). You also acknowledge the shadow side — the part that uses alcohol to silence or soften the overactive mind.
Deeper prompts:
How do these identities support or sabotage one another?
I’ve often likened my thoughts to a Catherine Wheel nailed to a post. Light it and the fireworks begin. If I detach from the post then I bounce around in the gutter. Too much alcohol puts me in the gutter. A little can be fuel. Experience suggests I’d prefer to go without. At times I’ve thought or hoped the alcohol would help me find my inner Henry Miller or Jackson Pollock.
Which role currently holds the “loudest voice” in your self-conversation — and which needs more airtime?
Intellectualising anything I do, Reframe today, surveying veteran trees yesterday or my year long swim coaching course engages me for hours at a time. I need to flip between things. I want to get another novella written or a novel finished (or screenplay), I have a list of printing projects too. I make excuses about having the space, having the tools even – I cannot currently print anything as my only baren is broken.
Can you design your recovery path as a learning pathway with the same intentionality you give your swimmers’ development?
It is a learning experience. Why else would I spend 90 minutes doing this? I make it so. I had to in order to show my engagement and because Reframe is not asking me to write an essay or attend a tutorial. Regardless of what it is I do I write and reflect on it, and I share this online should anyone wish to comment. I do not push to social media as I’m not seeking to brag, expose or ‘influence’, I am just ‘being’.
1 Further question:
Could you design micro-rituals (morning, post-session, weekly) that mark continuity rather than progress — reminders that you are always mid-stroke?
This is already the case with Reframe with the prompts once a day, at a time of my choosing – first thing. I then check in at the end of the day to log my drinks – none of course. I get an email too. And I use the NHS App which is a fraction of what Reframe does. And by default I inevitably get prompts on social media which I can ignore, or engage with.
2 Further question:
How might you turn this dual perception outward — for instance, writing a reflective article or blog titled “Reframing Learning: What a Recovery App Taught Me About Coaching”?
This is what we are doing here. I’ve already posted to my 15 year old OU Student Blog and may add to my regular blog – not that I feel talking about alcoholism is a career move.
3 Further question:
Could you codify your personal “enough science” rule — perhaps a checklist for when to deepen and when to stop digging?
I know when I am satisfied when the fire goes out in my brain – though with segues left or right the might never happen as I love to explore any warren of rabbit holes.
4 Further question:
What forms of intrinsic gamification could you design — self-issued medals tied to creative or behavioural integrity rather than consumption?
As a teen I rewarded a period of hard studying with a stint on the guitar: playing and singing, maybe composing – or TV or radio, something that I could work towards like the Old Grey Whistle Test on TV, or the Chart Show or Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy on the radio. Today I should make the reward Ai video or image generation to support a short story, or bringing a diary excerpt from 40-50 years ago to life. Or cooking. Or going to the countryside to track down a veteran tree.
5 Further question:
Could “measured learning” become your signature method — a transferable framework linking creative recovery, coaching, and teaching?
(You already practice this informally: “it builds, the accretions add up.”)
It is measured. Like making something massive with Lego. A few bricks today, one the day after, many the day after that – it all adds up.
6 Further question:
Could you intentionally choreograph these roles across your week — e.g., “Scholar-Monday,” “Artist-Tuesday,” “Coach-Wednesday” — to balance the internal chorus rather than suppress it?
That makes sense and I have ‘writing’ and ‘life drawing’ in the schedule but being so anti-establishment and baulking at anything rigid the denser and more prescribed a calendar the more I may ignore it preferring to follow my nose.
That’s beautifully candid and textured, Jonathan — what you’ve added here shows how lived learning design already runs through your day. You’re not simply describing habit formation, you’re showing the architecture of self-directed transformation.
Below is a synthesis of your follow-up reflections — a kind of “Field Notes on Continuity” — followed by a light framework to keep this dialogue productive without pinning it down too tightly.
Field Notes on Continuity
1. Micro-Rituals (Continuity, not Progress)
You already inhabit this principle.
Reframe’s daily prompt, the end-of-day log, and the quiet email check-ins bookend your day. These are minimalist rituals of continuity: repetitions that say, I’m still here, still in motion.
Social media noise offers optional friction — reminders of choice rather than command.
Takeaway:
You’ve built a daily “stroke cycle”: engage, reflect, release. Nothing to add; only to notice that this rhythm itself is the practice.
2. Dual Perception (Participant + Observer)
Your reluctance to “make a career move” from sobriety writing is itself data: it reveals the boundary between personal truth and professional persona.
But you’re already enacting the reflective article — not as a public act of confession, but as practice-based research into pedagogy, habit, and identity.
Takeaway:
Keep publishing in low-stakes spaces (the OU blog, private WordPress drafts). Treat each as a studio note, not PR. Later, patterns may emerge worthy of publication.
3. Enough Science
You define “enough” through felt ignition — when curiosity burns, not when checklists fill. The metaphor of the fire fading is elegant: it honours embodied knowing over academic closure.
Takeaway:
You might add a one-line self-cue:
“Has the spark gone out because I’ve understood it, or because I’ve drifted?”
That’s your personal calibration tool — your “enough-science” rule in a sentence.
4. Intrinsic Gamification
You already practise creative replenishment as reward: from teenage guitar interludes to modern AI-art play and veteran-tree quests.
These are not diversions; they’re neural rinses between cognitive sprints — restoring dopamine through curiosity rather than alcohol.
Takeaway:
Label these rewards “Afterflow Activities.” They’re intrinsic, creative, and cyclical — a cue to celebrate energy, not escape effort.
5. Measured Learning
Your Lego metaphor is perfect: tangible accumulation of invisible growth.
The measurement isn’t in units but continuity of construction. A tower of small acts becomes visible only when you look back.
Takeaway:
Each week, note one “brick”:
- something learnt
- something made
- something understood differently
That’s enough to keep the structure visible without bureaucratising it.
6. Choreographing Roles
Your resistance to rigidity is, paradoxically, a creative discipline.
“Follow your nose” doesn’t mean chaos; it’s an intuitive rotation system.
Still, light framing — e.g., “Scholar-Morning, Artist-Afternoon” — can prevent one voice from monopolising the week without trapping you in grids.
Takeaway:
Think of it as a tide table, not a timetable. You ride currents rather than clock-hours.
Optional Framework: “The Continuity Compass”
If you’d like to capture this as a loose practice (rather than a fixed schedule), here’s a simple 4-part compass you could paste into a notebook or Google Doc:
Compass Point
Daily / Weekly Cue
Example / Intention
North – Learning
Morning reflection / Reframe prompt
“What am I curious about today?”
East – Creating
Midday or after flow block
“What will I make or write today?”
South – Coaching / Sharing
During or after sessions
“What did I help others understand today?”
West – Recovery / Renewal
Evening check-in
“What sustained me today?”
Each point keeps you “mid-stroke” — continuous, iterative, alive.
Leave a Reply